Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Seismological  Research Letters GSW 2008 Users' Group Meeting
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Seismological Research Letters; May 2008; v. 79; no. 3; p. 416-423; DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.79.3.416
© 2008 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow ERRATUM
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cramer, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, K.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Maps for Memphis, Tennessee

Chris H. Cramer1,2, Glenn J. Rix3, and Kathleen Tucker1

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.


    INTRODUCTION
 
Until recently most regional maps of liquefaction hazard have been based primarily on geology, following the methodology of Youd and Perkins (1978). These maps predict the triggering of liquefaction and not its consequences. More than 50 of these maps, showing different areas of the United States, have been published since the methodology was first proposed (Power and Holzer 1996). Maps range in scale from 1:24,000 to 1:390,000. One shortcoming to these maps is that they usually depict the liquefaction hazard with a qualitative ranking, e.g., low, moderate, or high. Without specifying the hazard, these maps are not useful for risk-based studies. Recently, Holzer et al. (2003), Holzer, Bennett, Noce et al. (2006), and Romero-Hudock and Rix (2005) have applied the liquefaction potential index (LPI) proposed by Iwasaki et al. (1978, 1982) to estimate and map liquefaction probability.

Maps of the surficial geology were initially produced for generating seismic hazard maps for Memphis, Tennessee (see references in Cramer et al. 2006). Additionally, the liquefaction potential or probability curve for different soil columns in Memphis also has been developed along with scenario liquefaction potential maps (Romero-Hudock and Rix 2005). Specifically, scenario liquefaction potential maps for moment magnitude (M) 7.7 and 6.2 earthquakes in the southern New Madrid seismic zone were generated by Romero-Hudock and Rix (2005) prior to this study. In this paper we describe the methodology, procedure, and data used in generating probabilistic liquefaction hazard maps for Memphis, and we present the resulting maps. The Memphis liquefaction hazard maps present information in a format similar to the scenario liquefaction potential maps for Memphis by Romero-Hudock and Rix (2005).


    STATISTICAL BASIS
 
As proposed by Holzer, Bennett, Noce et al. (2006), Holzer, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Center for Earthquake Research and Information
University of Memphis
3890 Central Avenue
Memphis, Tennessee 38152-3050 USA
ccramer@memphis.edu
(C.H.C.)







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Seismological Society of America